|
|
Sneaked Versus Snuck & Past Tense Versus Past Participle
Driving back from the airport this weekend after our vacation, I put on an audio CD for the kids, one of the Horrid Henry stories. In part of the story, he was said to have "sneaked" into a room. Sneaked? Surely he "snuck" into the room, I thought. But then I lost confidence. Have I been saying "snuck" all these years by mistake?
To reassure myself, I quickly tried to think of other irregular verbs ending in -eak where I would do this. I couldn't think of any. Instead, I thought of examples where I don't do this. For example, I wouldn't say:
So how on earth did I come to believe that it was snuck rather than sneaked? AskOxford told me that I wasn't alone and that it was an American form that has grown popular. Common Errors In English agreed but warned I'd be safer sticking with "sneaked." Random House's The Mavens' Word Of The Day left me most reassured about snuck. It wrote comprehensively about how usage had changed, how it is indeed unusual as a -eak verb to have a -uck form and why no one should feel "snuck" is non-standard for American English Interestedly, Francesca Simon -- who writes the Horrid Henry books -- is an American who grew up in California (like me) who lives in the UK (like me). So why didn't she use "snuck" rather than "sneaked?" No idea, but since her British books use British spellings, I'm guessing "sneaked" won out over here. While discovering why I use "snuck," I also learned it was both a past tense and past participle for sneak. And what was the difference between "past tense" and "past participle" again? Yeah, here I am an English major asking about this. Cut me some slack. English majors don't take lessons in grammar. You know how we relearn grammatical forms we've long forgotten since elementary school? We study a foreign language! That's why I have on my shelf my trusty copy of English Grammar For Students Of German. Rather than reach for that, however, I first did a little web searching. A lot of what I found explained how a past participle was formed but not what it was in terms of when you use it. In other words, plenty of pages told me that a past participle is usually a verb with -ed added as a suffix, except for irregular verbs. Great, but what's the difference between that and the past tense in terms of usage, not in terms of how you make the verb form? OK, this page had a good definition of past tense: an action that was both started and finished in the past. The verb form to show this usually ends in -ed, so:
What about the past participle? That same page indirectly explains this is a verb form usually ending in -ed and with a helper or auxiliary verb that is used to represent the various perfect tenses, such as:
So to bring it back to sneak, if you consider it to be a regular verb, you use -ed as the suffix for the past tense and the -ed suffix with a helper verb to make the past participle form used for the perfect tenses. Examples show it better:
If you are like me and prefer to treat sneaked as a irregular verb, then forget that -ed suffix and use snuck:
Isn't grammar fun? No doubt, if I've got it wrong, folks will leave comments below. By Danny Sullivan on Feb. 21, 2006 | PermalinkSee related posts in: Life In Britain, Writing
Next Post: I Want Jack Bauer's Cell Phone Comments Comment by Pamela _ Wow, Pamela -- my AP guide doesn't have anything on it at all! My mine's the 1980 copyright edition, so it's a bit out of date :) Comment by Danny Sullivan Thank you so much for the info and explanation - I was completely stuck on this with a paper I'm writing. I finally get it!! Comment by .steph. | March 26, 2006 3:04 AM One of my favorite rants - thanks for posting. I think there should be a revision of the declension, to wit: "sneak, snack, snuck" ... ho-ho. Comment by PJohn | August 2, 2006 4:06 AM My ears and brain are annoyed every time I hear "snuck". Have you thought about a word much like it with only one letter change? It is also a word I definitely abhor. Sneaked sounds right to me, but then I am not a native Californian and certainly not a Southern Californian. A native Califronian told me to just"get over it". I don't think I will. I have lived in california for nearly 30 years, and I hope to retain my English grammar sensibilities. Comment by Jody "He will have sneaked into the room, before stealing the money. (present perfect tense)" I believe this should read... "He will have sneaked into the room, before stealing the money. (future perfect tense)" Comment by jeff | September 10, 2007 11:57 PM In case you're interested, you say above, "Past Perfect Tense: An action that happened in the past before another past action", and that's RIGHT. "Call me a taxi". "O.K., you're a taxi." The past perfect doesn't work that way. You can't make it work by putting 'had' in front of a past tense verb. Let me know if you don't know why I said what I said. Comment by bradvines | February 6, 2008 2:20 AM Want to comment? If you are signed into TypeKey, you'll see a form below. No form? Click on the sign-in link below, and you can sign-in or sign-up for a free account. Sorry you have to use TypeKey, but I use it to avoid comment spam. All comments currently appear automatically after posting.
|
Subscribe! Search
|
AP style guide says...sneaked is "preferred as past tense of sneak. Do not use the colloquial snuck." American? British? Don't know. I'm just sticking with AP.