<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Techmeme&#8217;s Front Pages: What&#8217;s Really A Big Story &amp; How To Go Back In Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daggle.com/techmemes-front-pages-whats-really-a-big-story-how-to-go-back-in-time-147/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daggle.com/techmemes-front-pages-whats-really-a-big-story-how-to-go-back-in-time-147</link>
	<description>Danny Sullivan&#039;s Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://daggle.com/techmemes-front-pages-whats-really-a-big-story-how-to-go-back-in-time-147/comment-page-1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 05:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daggle.com/wordpress/?p=147#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Thanks Danny.  About the imbalances in coverage, yep I hear that all the time.  The funny thing though is for everyone who expresses reservations about the Amandafest/Scoblefest/etc., there are 2 or 3 bloggers who link to my coverage approvingly.  I think I gain a lot of readers from these pileons.
But is there really an imbalance?  I&#039;m not sure what to think.  Now I don&#039;t consider my Tech coverage like a daily newspaper&#039;s tech coverage or Google News&#039;s tech coverage.  My readership cares alot more about media disruptions via tech.  So alot of the Scoblefest was justified.  But all of it?  And vs. Gates?  Yeah, it probably got excessive.  I think I would like to introduce some &quot;balance&quot;, whatever that involves.  But it will probably be a gradual journey to that goal.  (BTW, the Gates coverage indeed expanded somewhat:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techmeme.com/060616/h1000&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techmeme.com/060616/h1000&lt;/a&gt; )
As for browsing capabilities, you&#039;ve used the full extent of them.  More would certainly be nice, though I may wait until my sites are proven to have wider acceptance before bothering.  Right now I&#039;m working on features aimed at &quot;wider acceptance&quot;.
Anyway, thanks for preparing all the screenshots.  I think I may link to your post from my site blog as it offers handy tips that I haven&#039;t managed to  detail myself.  Though I&#039;ll need to prepare a post less rambling than this comment!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>Thanks Danny.  About the imbalances in coverage, yep I hear that all the time.  The funny thing though is for everyone who expresses reservations about the Amandafest/Scoblefest/etc., there are 2 or 3 bloggers who link to my coverage approvingly.  I think I gain a lot of readers from these pileons.<br />
But is there really an imbalance?  I&#8217;m not sure what to think.  Now I don&#8217;t consider my Tech coverage like a daily newspaper&#8217;s tech coverage or Google News&#8217;s tech coverage.  My readership cares alot more about media disruptions via tech.  So alot of the Scoblefest was justified.  But all of it?  And vs. Gates?  Yeah, it probably got excessive.  I think I would like to introduce some &#8220;balance&#8221;, whatever that involves.  But it will probably be a gradual journey to that goal.  (BTW, the Gates coverage indeed expanded somewhat:  <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/060616/h1000" rel="nofollow">http://www.techmeme.com/060616/h1000</a> )<br />
As for browsing capabilities, you&#8217;ve used the full extent of them.  More would certainly be nice, though I may wait until my sites are proven to have wider acceptance before bothering.  Right now I&#8217;m working on features aimed at &#8220;wider acceptance&#8221;.<br />
Anyway, thanks for preparing all the screenshots.  I think I may link to your post from my site blog as it offers handy tips that I haven&#8217;t managed to  detail myself.  Though I&#8217;ll need to prepare a post less rambling than this comment!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

